<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for eDoug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edoug.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edoug.com</link>
	<description>mediocracy redefined.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Iran officially &#8220;photoshops&#8221;. Fark not impressed. by Recent URLs tagged Fark - Urlrecorder</title>
		<link>http://www.edoug.com/2008/07/10/iran-officially-photoshops-fark-not-impressed/#comment-46206</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent URLs tagged Fark - Urlrecorder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edoug.com/?p=299#comment-46206</guid>
		<description>[...] Recent public urls tagged "fark"  &#8594; Iran officially “photoshops”. Fark not impressed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recent public urls tagged &#8220;fark&#8221;  &rarr; Iran officially “photoshops”. Fark not impressed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monaco House by McBride Charles Ryan by Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.edoug.com/2008/04/15/monaco-house-by-mcbride-charles-ryan/#comment-46203</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edoug.com/?p=249#comment-46203</guid>
		<description>That is a pretty insane house.  It looks like there is a good amount of space too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a pretty insane house.  It looks like there is a good amount of space too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lucid Dreaming by Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.edoug.com/2008/07/10/lucid-dreaming/#comment-46201</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edoug.com/?p=297#comment-46201</guid>
		<description>Another good resource at http://www.luciddreaming.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good resource at <a href="http://www.luciddreaming.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.luciddreaming.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lucid Dreaming by Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.edoug.com/2008/07/10/lucid-dreaming/#comment-46200</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edoug.com/?p=297#comment-46200</guid>
		<description>Lucid dreams are great fun. I am just getting back in to them. I have created a website with free web based tools (including an online dream journal &#38; a lucid clock to remind you to do reality checks), articles and a forum if you are interested in having more lucid dreams.

My site is at: http://www.iAmLucidDreaming.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucid dreams are great fun. I am just getting back in to them. I have created a website with free web based tools (including an online dream journal &amp; a lucid clock to remind you to do reality checks), articles and a forum if you are interested in having more lucid dreams.</p>
<p>My site is at: <a href="http://www.iAmLucidDreaming.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.iAmLucidDreaming.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lucid Dreaming by Reality Handbook</title>
		<link>http://www.edoug.com/2008/07/10/lucid-dreaming/#comment-46199</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Handbook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 02:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edoug.com/?p=297#comment-46199</guid>
		<description>Greetings eDoug...and welcome to lucid dreaming!  (I don't have a lot of people who I can talk to about it, so I do blogsearch.google.com to find people on the Interweb who are having similar experiences.)

I remember when I had my first truly involved lucid dream.  Really jarred me, I popped out of bed and immediately onto the computer to search on "dreaming when you know you're dreaming".  But that was sorta in the pre-Google era, I think I even used AltaVista back then.  :)

I was a bit unnerved at the time, twitching around at 6am.  One of the articles I came across explaining lucid dreaming talked of the presence of the "demon dream" and had this totally scary picture of a demon.  That page seems long gone, but I was like "oh no!"  Little did I know how much "oh no" there was going to be.  It's fun when you think it's part of your imagination, and then gets to be less fun when you start getting your bearings and feeling like you're actually visiting alternate universes.

I offer up my journal if you are interested...and in terms of your summoning objects to your hand, I have a telekinesis tag for those dreams where I summon objects, or otherwise cause physical effects with my mind:

   http://realityhandbook.livejournal.com/tag/telekinesis

I've found what really helps in conjuring objects out of thin air is to start a feedback loop by squeezing my hand into a fist where I rub my fingers against my palm.  As I do this, I try to remember the sensation of what it feels like to hold that object and mentally focus on it.  Very strange how causing the tickling gets the process rolling...

Regards,
&#230;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings eDoug&#8230;and welcome to lucid dreaming!  (I don&#8217;t have a lot of people who I can talk to about it, so I do blogsearch.google.com to find people on the Interweb who are having similar experiences.)</p>
<p>I remember when I had my first truly involved lucid dream.  Really jarred me, I popped out of bed and immediately onto the computer to search on &#8220;dreaming when you know you&#8217;re dreaming&#8221;.  But that was sorta in the pre-Google era, I think I even used AltaVista back then.  :)</p>
<p>I was a bit unnerved at the time, twitching around at 6am.  One of the articles I came across explaining lucid dreaming talked of the presence of the &#8220;demon dream&#8221; and had this totally scary picture of a demon.  That page seems long gone, but I was like &#8220;oh no!&#8221;  Little did I know how much &#8220;oh no&#8221; there was going to be.  It&#8217;s fun when you think it&#8217;s part of your imagination, and then gets to be less fun when you start getting your bearings and feeling like you&#8217;re actually visiting alternate universes.</p>
<p>I offer up my journal if you are interested&#8230;and in terms of your summoning objects to your hand, I have a telekinesis tag for those dreams where I summon objects, or otherwise cause physical effects with my mind:</p>
<p>   <a href="http://realityhandbook.livejournal.com/tag/telekinesis" rel="nofollow">http://realityhandbook.livejournal.com/tag/telekinesis</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found what really helps in conjuring objects out of thin air is to start a feedback loop by squeezing my hand into a fist where I rub my fingers against my palm.  As I do this, I try to remember the sensation of what it feels like to hold that object and mentally focus on it.  Very strange how causing the tickling gets the process rolling&#8230;</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
&aelig;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monaco House by McBride Charles Ryan by Layla</title>
		<link>http://www.edoug.com/2008/04/15/monaco-house-by-mcbride-charles-ryan/#comment-46198</link>
		<dc:creator>Layla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edoug.com/?p=249#comment-46198</guid>
		<description>That's a really interesting housing style.  I like the design, but it doesn't seem to be very space efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a really interesting housing style.  I like the design, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to be very space efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lucid Dreaming by Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.edoug.com/2008/07/10/lucid-dreaming/#comment-46197</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edoug.com/?p=297#comment-46197</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Nice pic - it's from my photo-blog.
www.richardalois.com


Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Nice pic - it&#8217;s from my photo-blog.<br />
<a href="http://www.richardalois.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.richardalois.com</a></p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iran officially &#8220;photoshops&#8221;. Fark not impressed. by John Maszka</title>
		<link>http://www.edoug.com/2008/07/10/iran-officially-photoshops-fark-not-impressed/#comment-46196</link>
		<dc:creator>John Maszka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edoug.com/?p=299#comment-46196</guid>
		<description>Whatever either candidate does, the United States needs to leave Iran with an honorable path of retreat (Colin Powell, The Craft of Diplomacy, 2004). The United States and the Bush administration have been threatening Iran for years with its foreign policy and its rhetoric.

“I believe President Bush is going to order air strikes (on Iran) before he leaves office”
-Norman Podhoretz (Lyons, 2007).

Bush and his cronies say they want peace and diplomacy, but the problem with the members of Bush administration is that you can’t trust them. You can’t take what they at face value. As former Nixon aide John W. Dean wrote, “George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney have created the most secretive presidency of my lifetime. Their secrecy is far worse than during Watergate” (quoted in Wittkopf and Jones, 2008, 329). 
The administration secretly planned and prepared for war with Iraq without disclosing it to the general public. Planning began in November of 2001 and included upgrading airfields in various Gulf countries, moving supplies to the region and the construction of necessary facilities. By April 2002, the planning and preparation for war was also being hidden from Congress. Bush had instructed General Tommy Franks not to make financial requests through Washington. “Anything you need, you’ll have.” The money would no longer be appropriated through congress. By the end of July 2002, Bush had approved more than thirty projects totaling over $700 million. Congress had no knowledge or involvement (Woodward, 2004, 122). 
In December of 2002, Bush and Rumsfeld agreed to start secretly deploying troops into the theatre so as not to attract the attention of the press or the rest of the world. The first deployment order went out on December 6, 2002 and deployments continued every two weeks or so thereafter. Troops were given less than a week’s notice at times. In January 2003, the Bush administration arranged for much of its humanitarian relief to be disguised as general contributions to conceal its war planning from the NGO recipients. Yet, when asked about Iraq, Bush’s favorite response was “I have no war plans on my desk.” At one point or another after the planning began, nearly every member of the administration publicly denied any plans to go to war with Iraq (Woodward, 2004, 129). 

A better approach to Iran would be negotiations. While Fareed Zakaria agrees that there is no reason not to use sanctions and embargoes against states such as Iran, he suggests that we also need to “allow a viable way out.” That is to say, we need to negotiate and not merely mandate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever either candidate does, the United States needs to leave Iran with an honorable path of retreat (Colin Powell, The Craft of Diplomacy, 2004). The United States and the Bush administration have been threatening Iran for years with its foreign policy and its rhetoric.</p>
<p>“I believe President Bush is going to order air strikes (on Iran) before he leaves office”<br />
-Norman Podhoretz (Lyons, 2007).</p>
<p>Bush and his cronies say they want peace and diplomacy, but the problem with the members of Bush administration is that you can’t trust them. You can’t take what they at face value. As former Nixon aide John W. Dean wrote, “George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney have created the most secretive presidency of my lifetime. Their secrecy is far worse than during Watergate” (quoted in Wittkopf and Jones, 2008, 329).<br />
The administration secretly planned and prepared for war with Iraq without disclosing it to the general public. Planning began in November of 2001 and included upgrading airfields in various Gulf countries, moving supplies to the region and the construction of necessary facilities. By April 2002, the planning and preparation for war was also being hidden from Congress. Bush had instructed General Tommy Franks not to make financial requests through Washington. “Anything you need, you’ll have.” The money would no longer be appropriated through congress. By the end of July 2002, Bush had approved more than thirty projects totaling over $700 million. Congress had no knowledge or involvement (Woodward, 2004, 122).<br />
In December of 2002, Bush and Rumsfeld agreed to start secretly deploying troops into the theatre so as not to attract the attention of the press or the rest of the world. The first deployment order went out on December 6, 2002 and deployments continued every two weeks or so thereafter. Troops were given less than a week’s notice at times. In January 2003, the Bush administration arranged for much of its humanitarian relief to be disguised as general contributions to conceal its war planning from the NGO recipients. Yet, when asked about Iraq, Bush’s favorite response was “I have no war plans on my desk.” At one point or another after the planning began, nearly every member of the administration publicly denied any plans to go to war with Iraq (Woodward, 2004, 129). </p>
<p>A better approach to Iran would be negotiations. While Fareed Zakaria agrees that there is no reason not to use sanctions and embargoes against states such as Iran, he suggests that we also need to “allow a viable way out.” That is to say, we need to negotiate and not merely mandate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on uhm&#8230;did we land on Mars or something? by doug</title>
		<link>http://www.edoug.com/2008/05/30/uhmdid-we-land-on-mars-or-something/#comment-46194</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edoug.com/?p=278#comment-46194</guid>
		<description>Sex in the Old Medina!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sex in the Old Medina!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Women&#8217;s Studies Trailer by Madiha</title>
		<link>http://www.edoug.com/2008/04/08/womens-studies-trailer/#comment-46188</link>
		<dc:creator>Madiha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edoug.com/?p=229#comment-46188</guid>
		<description>That movie looks really interesting but then it seems like it turns into horror.  I guess I'll have to watch it to find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That movie looks really interesting but then it seems like it turns into horror.  I guess I&#8217;ll have to watch it to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
